For the past couple of years, case since the advent of the iPad and other tablets, seek there has been a lot of digital ink spilled over how we’re living in a \”post-PC world\”. It got me thinking as to what that means.\n\nAt first blush, it sounds like the prediction that the computer as we know it is going away forever. With today’s announcement that Dell is taking itself private (the opposite of what you usually hear, right?) and the lack of focus on the part of Apple over the past 3 or 4 years on OSX upgrades, it might seem that the headlong surge to mobile computing might be the end of our relationship with our computers at home or work.\n\nNot so fast.\n\nAs we sit here today, I believe the definition of a \”post-PC world\” means how we interact with our data and how that data is stored. Cloud storage has made it insanely easy to never be far from your digital stuff. Before, everything had to be stored locally on your hard drive. Now Dropbox, Amazon cloud services, Google Drive and dozens of others make all your stuff accessible from anywhere. The ability to get your music, documents, email, photos, etc. from multiple devices says more about how we store and interact with things, and less about the machines we use to get to that storage locker in the sky.\n\nThere are certain things that phones, tablets and other \”post-PC\” devices are still not much good at: Skype, video gaming, video editing, Photoshop, document creation and document editing etc etc etc., and until such time as they can handle \”computer\” tasks like these, they will always just be cloud access devices.\n\nSo, I think branding this evolution as post-PC is somewhat misleading. \”Post hard drive\” might be more accurate.\n\nHow about you? How much do you rely on the cloud?
I love keeping my eyes open for changing trends in behavior, see especially online behavior.\n\n\n\nThe battle to maintain one’s privacy in a world of socially mediated publicness is a topic well picked over. Both celebrities and folks of less renown have all had a digital mishap, whether it’s the mistaken click on \”Reply all\” or the R-rated photo that ends up in the wrong hands.\n\nThe message of \”the internet is forever\” is probably as firmly embedded in the consciousness of folks young and old, just like \”look both ways before you cross the street.\” Not that people always heed the good advice they hear.\n\nInto the breach have stepped several apps and services designed to anonymize your activity online. Wickr, Snapchat and the Silent Circle products are just a few examples of companies trying to help you keep your private life private.\n\n Wickr offers \”military-grade encryption of text, picture, audio and video messages.\” Yikes!\n\nSnapchat is a photo-only service (for now) that allows you to put a time limit on how long the picture will display on the recipient’s device, up to 10 seconds. I gather this one is popular with the younger crowd.\n\nThe Silent Circle family of products were created by a \”mix of world-renowned cryptographers, Silicon Valley software engineers…and former US Navy SEALs and British Special Air Service security experts.\” They even offer a feature called \”Burn Notice.\” Too much time watching USA Network?\n\nAll kidding aside, it appears that the time is right for options like these, for various reasons. While no one is FORCING you to post a status update on Facebook or check in on Foursquare, none of us ever feel totally confident that what we try to keep private actually remains that way. Our website visits are tracked by advertisers or your ISP, our emails and texts logged, phone conversations recorded. There is no digital equivalent to the Mafia movie scenes where the two guys walk outside amid traffic noise, and far from wiretaps, to have a private conversation.\n\nNowadays, closing the door to your office has no digital equivalent.\n\nAll of us have had that slightly queasy feeling that everything we do might someday be a part of the public record. I’m not positive that even these three services can successfully wipe the digital slate clean. It seems to me that communications sent from your phone, across a network to someone else’s device must be stored SOMEWHERE. Do your research.\n\nToo often the argument for more privacy online (or off) is attacked with the tired argument of \”well, if you’re not doing anything wrong, you shouldn’t be worried.\” That is so stupid on its face I won’t comment further. Smart people do dumb things, to be sure, but there are few justifications for the level of invasiveness granted to corporations, public utilities, your employer, etc. And there are times when you might like to talk to someone about something, and not have the whole world potentially know about it.\n\nThis is not some unhinged Libertarian rant against Big Brother, but I wonder if we are not seeing some push back in an area that all of us have probably felt some prior discomfort.\n\nPlus, getting to play \”Mission: Impossible\” with your phone could be kind of fun. \”This text will self-destruct in five seconds…\”\n\nWhat do you think? Do you think these kind of apps are responding to a real need? Would you sign up for one of them? Post a comment.
The concept of regulation, viagra sales especially when modified by the word \”government,\” often produces a knee jerk reaction among many who feel that if the government is involved, things can only end badly.\n\n\n\nAbout this time last year, I wrote about the well-meaning but impossibly overmatched Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) passed in 1998, at a time when the internet did not even bear a passing resemblance to today’s internet. [Click here to read that post.] The focus of that post was largely about parents and other authority figures encouraging kids to lie to get around Terms of Service agreements. Today, the FTC is attempting to strengthen COPPA in a futile attempt to deal with data mining and behavioral targeting.\n\nNaturally, this effort to redress the shortcomings of a law passed in the internet Stone Age is being met with opposition. I think it’s always useful to examine exactly WHO is against any kind of regulatory change as a good first step towards parsing whether that change is good or bad.\n\nIn this case, the charges of \”get government off my back\” are coming from the likes of Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and twitter, not to mention television networks, app platforms and advertising trade groups.\n\nI am not making any earth-shattering observation when I say that kids, especially pre-teens and teenagers, do not spend a lot of time thinking about the long-term consequences of online behavior. (Heck, neither do a lot of adults.) An innocent upload of a picture so they can see themselves on their computer screen next to a Disney character or battling robots inside of an app seems, to them, like no big deal.\n\nBusinesses survive by cultivating new customers, and with kids flocking to the internet in droves, they go to where the prospects are. I’m not convinced that any regulation, no matter how well-intentioned, can stanch the flow of data mining and behavioral targeting. The internet did not kill privacy, as fashionable as it is sometimes to take that position.\n\nThe only real alternative is to discuss internet safety and internet smarts with your kids. Many parents feel ill-equipped to do so because they themselves feel like they are unaware of how best to act online. The fact is, being online is not that much different than being out in the world, and you should govern yourself accordingly. It is neither reasonable nor feasible to opt out of the internet, just like you cannot opt our of society in general. A little common sense will always carry the day.\n\nAnd keep an eye on who is for and who is against some of these things. That ought to scare you more than the possibility of your kid being served an advertisement for chocolate covered Doritos.\n\nWhat do you think? Can anything really be done to protect kids from being marketed to and having their data collected? Leave a comment in the comments section.
I’ve been thinking a lot about Instagram lately and I’ve noticed that I am not alone.\n\nA recent study from the Pew Research Center revealed that 46% of adult internet users post original photos or videos online that they themselves created. This was the first time they had asked about Pinterest, nurse Instagram and Tumblr, so there is no historical data to compare the numbers to, but the numbers are sure to continue growing. According to the study, \”27% of internet users between 18-29 use Instagram.\”\n\n\n\nAnd then this, from AllThingsD: \”In August  US smartphone owners visited Instagram from their smartphones more frequently and for longer periods of time than they visited Twitter.\” Instagram had an average of 7.3 million daily active users to Twitter’s 6.9 million, and they spent nearly twice as long perusing.\n\nWhen Facebook allegedly coughed up $1 billion to buy Instagram, the black crows in the media focused on the astronomical price tag for a company that hadn’t made any money yet. I was more interested in WHY Facebook decided to acquire the popular service. More accurately, I’m intrigued by what the rise of photo sharing apps means to the future of communications. I happen to love Instagram and enjoy seeing the way people express their creativity. It also challenges me to try and find the visual narrative in any given situation. While there is certainly an overabundance of food photos, pet photos and pictures showing the view from an airplane with the wing featured prominently, I wonder how we will all tell our stories over the next few years. While Facebook and twitter allow for photo attachments, the updates that people post are largely text-based. Maybe it’s because of my background in creating television and video that I find visual storytelling more compelling, but I’m certainly not alone. If a picture is worth a thousand words, how much is a picture passed through a saturation filter worth?\n\nDo you use Instagram or some other photo sharing app? What do you find compelling about it?
I first discovered podcasts and podcasting somewhere around 2006, check and my mind was blown. The first podcast I came upon was all about production, remedy technology, communications- in short, everything that was of interest to me. It blew my mind because of the obvious potential to narrowcast and reach large audiences which were not quite large enough for traditional radio or TV. One million podcast listeners is huge. One million TV viewers gets you cancelled before the second episode airs.\n\nIn the years that followed, it seemed like everyone with a mic and a laptop started releasing podcasts during this chaos period, but now it is clear that podcasting has reached a new and exciting level of maturity.\n\n\n\n \n\nMy enthusiasm for them has not waned one iota. In fact, I receive the vast majority of my news, information and entertainment from podcasts. Because it is such a personal medium, it feels very \”one-to-one\” and that appeals to me.\n\nOne area that has experienced a huge boom, and resultant ripple effect, is comedy. A few years back I happened upon Marc Maron’s WTF podcast, which led me to Greg Fitzsimmons’ Fitzdog Radio and on and on. Both of these shows are essentially interview shows, not comics doing their acts. Maron’s self-revelatory style over 300+ episodes has won him a huge following and a TV deal for an upcoming show on IFC. To hear him tell it, it has also resurrected what was, by his own admission, a dormant stand-up career.\n\nFitzsimmons’ career seems to be on the upswing, too, as a result of his podcast, although he often riffs on how hard he has worked to arrive comfortably \”in the middle.\” He says he gets recognized on the street occasionally, but mostly he works steadily in Hollywood, which is the dream of any creative type.\n\nTwo back to back articles in the NY Times this past week about the comics Chris Hardwick and Rob Delaney, and the \”direct-to-audience\” model pioneered so expertly by Louis CK are further evidence of the power of podcasting to speak to your audience directly, and find new audiences in the process.\n\nI made a blog post back in 2007 (Good God, have I been blogging that long?) about the huge potential I saw in podcasting. While NPR and other mainstream content providers have used podcasts to great mutual benefit for themselves and their audiences, there is still plenty of room for growth.\n\nI think it’s time for me to get back to my podcast. I’ve been too lazy.\n\nSo, do you listen to podcasts? If so, got any good recommendations?